Hitch Hints     

    Home | Subscription | Contact Us
Comparing 1500 HD and 2500 HD Pickups by Andy Thomson

Andy ThomsonA couple of issues back I suggested to a reader that he take a look at the GM 1500 HD pickup truck to tow his fifth wheel. We have a 1500 HD at the dealership for our current demo truck, and have used them in the past so I am very comfortable with this truck’s capabilities. The reader who wrote in was looking for an all-round truck that would be able to tow, but would also be an easy truck to live with the balance of the year for commuting to work and such. So this is a truck that will likely tow about 20% of its mileage. I guess I should have explained it further as I have received some letters wondering why I would suggest it and not the 2500 HD truck. One couple who wrote in thought that the combination would actually be dangerous to drive, thinking I was suggesting a half-ton for a 32 foot fifth wheel.

When towing a fifth wheel one of the primary concerns is overloading the rear axle capacity, as all pin weight is added to the rear axle. The rear GAWR (gross axle weight rating) is what the rear axle, tires, springs and hardware are rated to carry by the manufacturer. There is also a rating for the front suspension, but towing a fifth wheel does not add any weight to the front axle so it is not a concern to us here. Though many tow ratings do not have much basis in fact, truck axle ratings do and should not be exceeded. The GVWR (gross vehicle weight rating) is what the truck is rated to carry (not tow) if loaded to its maximum. If you are looking at a truck all these figures are on a sticker on the drivers door frame.

In 1999 GM introduced its latest designs of half and three-quarter ton trucks, but the one ton was not introduced until 2001 when the Duramax diesel and the 8.1 litre gas engines became available. In the new one ton truck they decided to call the single wheel a 2500 HD and the dual wheel truck a 3500. Now this is where it gets confusing – the 8600 GVWR truck that was introduced in 1999 is a 2500 (without the HD designation) if it is an extended cab but if the same truck is a crew cab it is called the 1500 HD. So the 1500 HD is not a half ton truck, it is a 3/4 ton in all but its name. Anything I say here about the 1500 HD also applies to the 2500 without the HD designation.

Though it is almost identical to the 2500 HD as a day-to-day truck to drive, the 1500HD has a few advantages. It is two-and-one-half inches lower, which may not sound like much but it does make a substantial difference. If you raise the roof on a vehicle two-and-one-half inches but leave the chassis height the same, then there will be a barely noticeable difference in performance. But when you raise the entire chassis of a vehicle by that amount, then you raise the centre of gravity which is not as good for stability. For a day-to-day truck, the lower height is easier to get in and out of. As well, the lower height reduces drag to slightly improve fuel economy and performance. Sometimes it also allows the fifth wheel to be lower, further reducing drag.

For frequent cold starts and short trips, a gas engine is better than a diesel and it is certainly quieter. Reducing the drag of the truck allows the 6.0 litre engine to have more power left over to tow the fifth wheel, while delivering reasonably good economy both towing and solo.

So other than the height, what are the differences between a 1500 HD and a 2500 HD?

Brakes are almost identical – the rear rotors on the 2500 HD are 1.1 inches thick as opposed to 1.4 inches thick on the 1500 HD, but otherwise they are the same. The frame on the 2500 HD is made with .197-inch thick steel as opposed to .157-inch on the 1500 HD (or .106-inch on a half-ton 1500). Any difference in frame flex is virtually impossible to detect, as the 1500 HD frame feels much stiffer than the frame of a 1998 one ton. The rear GAWR on the 2500 HD is 6,084 pounds as opposed to 6,000 on the 1500 HD. Subtract the empty weight and both trucks have approximately 3,400 pounds of load capacity available on their rear axles. Tires, wheel base, springs and shocks are all identical, so there is no safety advantage with the 2500 HD.

One interesting thing I did discover when researching this is that the rear axle of the 2500 HD has weight rating of 6,900 pounds but they keep the GAWR at 6,084 pounds, which is the limit of the tires. 265/75-16 tires have a load capacity of 6,830 pounds, so I would not be surprised to see GM increase the tire size and the rear axle capacity at some time, which would be nice for those towing heavier fifths that do not want dual wheels. We have actually done this on one truck where the customer was running almost at maximum load, just to give the tires some leeway in their load capacity.

The transmission in the 1500 HD is the MT1 four-speed automatic that GM introduced in 1992 and has refined considerably since. This transmission is capable of handling more power than the 6.0 litre can produce. It is one of the nicest and most reliable automatics available, and its shift points are well suited to towing. The first gear ratio is 2.48:1, which could be a little lower if you had to start out on a very steep hill, but it will always get you there. And with a four wheel drive truck, you always have low range for that very rare instance. The 248:1 ratio does allow you to climb very steep hills at a little higher speed.

The 2500 HD with the Duramax or 8.1 will certainly climb some hills a little faster than the 6.0 litre. However you will never save enough time on hills to make up for the time you spend in the gas station feeding the 8.1, and some would rather downshift once in a while rather than listen to a diesel. Others love the sound of that diesel hammering away up a big grade. As diesels have become more powerful they have lost a little fuel economy, while gas engines have become more efficient. So diesels have lost some of their economic advantage. If you put enough miles on in a year then you can justify the additional cost of the diesel. Currently, the break-even point is about 35,000 kilometres a year.

Further, you may find that dealer incentives and low interest financing deals apply to the 1500 HD and not the 2500 HD. When bearing these considerations into account, the 1500 HD may wind up being several thousand dollars less than a 2500 HD. If you would like a nice day-to-day truck that will also tow a large fifth wheel, the 1500 HD is a very nice package that is often overlooked.

If you want to do some serious, high-mileage towing or are getting into the 13,000 - 14,000 pound dry weight class, then a 2500 HD with the Duramax or the 8.1 litre gas would worth looking at. The heavier rear axle would also be of some value if you are running near the maximum load on a regular basis.

When looking for a truck, it is important to think about your own use of the vehicle and how it will fit with your lifestyle. I think back to not very many years ago when we were quite limited on vehicles and engines. Now it is great to have so many choices. (Page Top)


Copyright © Taylor Publishing Group. All Rights Reserved.